The top Democrat in the US Senate has called for current and former White House aides to give testimony at Donald Trump’s expected impeachment trial.
Chuck Schumer said he wanted senior officials including White House acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and ex-adviser John Bolton to be summoned.
But the Republicans, who control the Senate, have called for a short trial without witnesses.
A vote in the House to impeach Mr Trump is expected on Wednesday.
If a majority votes for impeachment, the case will then move to a trial in the Republican-controlled Senate.
The president is accused of soliciting a foreign country to help him politically, by trying to force Ukraine to launch a corruption investigation into Democratic rival Joe Biden.
Mr Trump is also accused of obstructing Congress. The White House refused to allow staff to testify during hearings in the House of Representatives in recent weeks.
Mr Trump denies wrongdoing. He has called the Democrat-led inquiry a “witch hunt” and predicted it will even benefit him in next year’s presidential election.
What did Schumer say?
Mr Schumer made the appeal for witnesses in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Sunday.
In addition to Mr Mulvaney and Mr Bolton – a former National Security Adviser – he also called for Robert Blair, a top aide to Mr Mulvaney, and budget official Michael Duffey to give testimony at the expected Senate trial.
“All four of these witnesses were asked to testify in the House impeachment inquiry but did not appear,” the letter says.
Mr Schumer said the trial must be one “that not only hears all the evidence and adjudicates the case fairly; it must also pass the fairness test with the American people”.
He referred to the “bipartisan spirit” of the 1999 impeachment trial of then-President Bill Clinton in which witnesses were called.
“It is clear that the Senate should hear testimony of witnesses at this trial as well,” he wrote, as he called for subpoenas to be issued for the four men.
Mr Schumer said he also wanted the Senate to issue subpoenas for a set of documents that Democrats believe “will shed additional light” on Mr Trump’s dealings with Ukraine.
He also laid out a timetable for the expected Senate trial, suggesting that pre-trial proceedings take place on 6 January and that senators and US Chief Justice John Roberts, who will preside over the case, be sworn in the next day. In total, he suggested as many as 126 hours of proceedings.
- A SIMPLE GUIDE: If you want a basic take, this one’s for you
- GO DEEPER: Here’s a 100, 300 and 800-word summary of the story
- WHAT’S IMPEACHMENT? A political process to remove a president
- VIEW FROM TRUMP COUNTRY: Hear from residents of a West Virginia town
- CONTEXT: Why Ukraine matters to the US
- FACT-CHECK: Did Ukraine interfere in the 2016 election to help Clinton?
Are the witnesses likely to be summoned?
Observers say the debate over the rules for the the trial is likely to be as divisive as the issue of impeachment itself.
Republicans have called for a trial without witnesses, limiting political fanfare.
Asked on Friday whether he wanted a long or short trial, Mr Trump said it “doesn’t matter”.
“I’ll do whatever I want. We did nothing wrong. So I’ll do long, or short,” he told reporters.
However, he has also indicated that he would like to see witnesses called such as Joe Biden and his son.
The White House has not yet publicly commented on Mr Schumer’s letter. A spokesman for Mr McConnell told Reuters news agency that he would meet Mr Schumer soon “to discuss the contours of a trial”.
As majority leader, Mr McConnell has the final say over the format of the proceedings.
A Senate vote requires a two-thirds majority to convict the president – and, given that Republicans hold sway in that chamber, Mr Trump is widely expected to be acquitted.
What’s the background?
President Trump is accused of pressuring Ukraine to dig up damaging information on one of his main Democratic challengers for the presidency in 2020, Joe Biden, and his son Hunter.
Hunter worked for a Ukrainian company when Joe Biden was US vice-president.
Mr Trump is accused of using two things as bargaining chips to Ukraine – withholding $400m of military aid to Ukraine that had already been allocated by Congress, and a White House meeting for Ukraine’s president.
This, Democrats say, amounts to an abuse of presidential power, using the office for personal political gain and to the detriment of national security. Ukraine was using that money in its ongoing conflict with Russia.
Mr Trump is also accused of obstructing Congress by refusing to co-operate with the congressional inquiry.
Mr Trump denies using US military aid – which was eventually released – as a bargaining chip. He says it was appropriate to ask Ukraine to investigate “corruption”, referring to the energy firm where Hunter Biden worked.